Cruise Missiles? Amazon Hub Targeted—Again

Photo: Tada Images / Shutterstock

Iran’s Revolutionary Guards say they have blown up the same Amazon data center in Bahrain three separate times since March, and now they are warning civilians to stay far away from American forces as the region braces for more strikes.

Story Snapshot

Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps has claimed strikes on Amazon’s Bahrain data infrastructure in March, April, and July 2026.
Iran says each attack was payback for U.S. military strikes on its territory, including its coastline and a nuclear site.
Amazon, Bahrain, and U.S. officials have not confirmed the claims, and one report called the strike “not independently verified.”
The Guards are now telling civilians to avoid U.S. military positions across the Gulf region.
The claims come amid a wider stretch of strikes hitting Jordan, Kuwait, Syria, and shipping lanes in the Strait of Hormuz.

Repeated Claims of Strikes on a Single Data Hub

Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps first said it hit Amazon’s Bahrain facility in early March, with Iranian state media claiming the company was targeted for backing the U.S. military. Weeks later, in April, the Guards said they struck and “destroyed” the same cloud computing center, calling it their first move against firms they accuse of helping U.S. and Israeli spying. By July, Iran claimed a third strike, this time saying its air force fired several cruise missiles at what it called Amazon’s “central data infrastructure”.

Each claim followed a similar pattern. Iranian state outlets released a statement, sometimes paired with video of a rocket launch, describing the target as tied to U.S. military support. Tech news outlet The Register noted that Iran said it “struck offline” the same Amazon Web Services site months after first claiming to take it down, raising questions about how the facility could be repeatedly destroyed.

Retaliation Message and Warnings to Civilians

Iran frames every strike as payback. The Guards said the July attack answered U.S. strikes carried out the day before against sites tied to Iran’s coast. Earlier claims linked strikes to what Iran called “assassinations” of its citizens and to U.S. bombing near a nuclear facility under construction. Alongside these claims, Iranian officials have told ordinary people in the region to keep away from American bases and equipment, warning that more strikes could follow without notice.

The warnings arrive as fighting has spread well past Bahrain. Reports describe Iranian strikes or claimed strikes hitting a U.S. base in Jordan, radar and drone sites in Kuwait, and vessels near the Strait of Hormuz. Bahrain’s interior ministry confirmed a fire broke out at a company facility after one attack and said firefighters put it out, though it stopped short of blaming the blaze entirely on Iran.

Damage Claims Remain Unconfirmed

None of the claims have been independently verified by Amazon, Bahraini officials, or the U.S. government. One report covering the initial strike said it “has not been” confirmed by outside sources. This gap between claim and confirmation is common in modern conflicts, where combatants often announce successful hits before anyone can check the damage on the ground, especially at facilities like data centers that are hard to inspect from outside.

Cloud outages can also come from many causes besides a missile strike, including routine technical failures, making it harder to separate wartime propaganda from real damage. Still, the repeated nature of the claims, three separate incidents tied to three separate rounds of U.S. action, suggests Iran is using the Amazon facility as a recurring symbol of its response to American strikes, whether or not the physical damage matches the rhetoric.

Why This Matters for the Wider Region

For everyday Americans, the fight over a data center thousands of miles away may feel distant. But Bahrain hosts major U.S. naval operations, and Amazon’s cloud systems support businesses and government services worldwide. Attacks or claimed attacks on that kind of shared infrastructure show how quickly a regional military conflict can reach into everyday commercial systems people rely on without ever thinking about where the servers sit.

The dispute also highlights a pattern many Americans already distrust: governments and militaries on all sides making bold public claims that outpace verified facts. Whether the strikes did the damage Iran describes or not, the warnings to civilians and the string of claimed attacks point to a Gulf region still very much on edge, with no clear sign the exchanges are slowing down.